Today a post on facebook provided a link to this article, and commented that “The unchurched are hungry for places that are set apart.” (I am not making any comment on the person making the post, so I will not identify them.) That was followed by a comment and a reply, as follows:
Comment: Amen; the places that are set apart must be run by people who are set apart - credible witnesses.”
Reply: Yep; that's why I don't understand the saying "At our church, we do things that are relevant to culture." (In regards to music, technology, atmosphere...etc)
That's completely opposite to me.
There are a couple of presumptions made in the linked article that are worthy of discussion. Also, I note that the interchange on facebook would seem indicate that there is some belief that “set apart” and “culturally relevant” are at odds with one another. While this thread is open to all discussion relating to the article, my initial goal was to discuss the facebook interchange within its entire context.
So, is “relevant to culture” completely opposite to “set apart”?