Whats the difference between NIV, KJV, NLT, and The Message? Why do people praise one and condemn another?
I'll second what Nothingman said...I remember when we used The Message for a while at IBC. But it does vary. Generally I think the service uses a translation geared towards ease of understanding (i.e. not something like the NASB which can be a more stilted, literal translation...I use it in my personal reading though).
People sometimes praise one over the other because of how they were raised, denominational affiliation, whatever...(
my favorite word).
Some of this goes back to traditionalist attitudes in general. "It's always been that way, and that's the way it will always be." "God doesn't change, neither will my Bible." The KJV has a huge following, my guess would be because it's one of the older English translations. It has a few issues related to the texts used for the translations...something you may run across called textual criticism. And that is perhaps an area you would be interested in pursuing.
There was an introductory, popular book on textual criticism of the Bible called
Misquoting Jesus, but I would read the
review written by one of the scholars at Dallas Theological Seminary for a bit of context if you ever check out Ehrman's book. Finally, I found an old
post I wrote after I read the book by Ehrman.